- India's move of revoking special status of Kashmir could prove dangerous: China Daily
India's Move Of Revoking Special Status Of Kashmir Could Prove Dangerous: China Daily
By revoking the special status of Indian occupied Kashmir and splitting it into two union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, New Delhi has opened a Pandora's box
India's unilateral move to fundamentally change the administrative division of the region and seize Pakistani and Chinese territories have angered its two neighbors and invited strong reactions from both, according to an article published by China Daily here on Thursday.
New Delhi's intention may be to completely change the status quo of the disputed region by revising its domestic law. But its careless move could put the already fragile geopolitical balance at risk, with many fearing the situation could deteriorate in the future.
To begin with, the security situation in Kashmir could take a turn for the worse. Ever since Kashmiri leader Burhan Wani was killed by Indian security forces on July 2016, the troubled region has been mired in clashes between Indian forces and Kashmiri protesters.
Given their strained relations with the Indian security forces, Kashmiri people fear that by abrogating the region's special status, which endowed the region near-autonomous rights, the Indian government aims to change the demography of the region.
Thousands of Indian troops were deployed in Kashmir before the Indian government revoked Kashmir's special status. Just weeks before the move, some reports said Indian forces had used cluster bombs against civilians along the Neelum River causing many casualties.
For more than a week, telephone, mobile phone and internet services have been suspended in Indian occupied Kashmir. And while all main roads are blocked, top Kashmiri politicians have been put under house arrest.
Second, India's reckless move to change the legal status of Kashmir could deal a lethal blow to India-Pakistan relations. The Kashmir issue led to three wars between the neighbors, and Pakistan sees India's latest move as infringing on its national sovereignty and security interests, which mean India's move in Kashmir will put India-Pakistan relations to further test.
As a double-edged sword, Hindutva could win the support of the majority community, mostly the upper castes, but it could also spell trouble for the BJP government if it cannot meet the Hindu nationalists' increasing and absurd demands.
The international community has largely criticized India's move and expressed deep concern over the situation in Kashmir.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres recalled the 1972 Simla Agreement between India and Pakistan, which states the "final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means" and in accordance with the UN Charter.
While India argues the Kashmir dispute is a bilateral issue between New Delhi and Islamabad and not subject to third-party mediation, the UN Security Council could get involved if the situation in Kashmir continues to worsen and tensions between India and Pakistan reach a flash point, because the UN Charter states that the UN Security Council has the responsibility of safeguarding international peace and security.
Essentially, the Kashmir conflict is a dispute leftover by colonial history and should be peacefully resolved according to the UN Charter, relevant UN Security Council resolutions and bilateral accords.